2. It is recognized that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflected his mistake, and that the defendant has no record of punishment except that sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in imprisonment without prison labor for a year in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents around 1993.

However, the crime of this case was committed by deceiving the victim by delivering forged promissory notes to the victim, and was committed by the victim, but the crime of this case was committed by deceiving the victim's real estate, but was committed by the victim. The sale price of the real estate owned by the victim reaches approximately KRW 1.6 billion and the method of committing the crime was planned, and thus, the criminal liability is heavy. There is no special change in circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below, and there is no other change in the circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing, including the defendant's age, character, character, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime was committed, it is not determined that the sentence imposed by

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.