However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 09:10 on September 13, 2014, the Defendant continued to receive 112 reports from police officers E belonging to the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station D District, which called out after receiving 119 first aid workers report to the effect that the Defendant would not be a restraint, and had been urged to return home from the police officers E belonging to the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station D District, which was called out by the Defendant. On September 13, 2014, the Defendant used the 119 first aid workers to talk with the 119 first aid workers, such as ring the 119 first aid service while drinking the 119 second aid vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties on 112 reported business affairs and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes of F, G and H;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or above (i.e., the fact that the defendant repents his mistake, appears to be a contingent crime committed under the influence of alcohol, there is no record of criminal punishment against the defendant, age of the defendant, part of money for the victimized police officer, etc.).