On November 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 25 years of imprisonment with prison labor by the Ulsan District Court for murder, and is serving in prisons in port.

The Defendant, at around 15:00 on January 13, 2016, had an interview with D/L belonging to the T/L correctional institution in the middle-class room of the Port C of the Port C of the 1001, in the North-gu Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, the Northern-si, the Northern-si, the 1001, saying, “The Defendant would not be concentrating in view of the hm head’s book” from D, whereby the Defendant had lived;

Mental and medical treatment shall be well received

“I hear the horses, I am the victim’s face several times due to drinking, and again put D with approximately 10 days to the right side of this part, which requires treatment for about 10 days.

As a result, the defendant assaulted D who is a public official in charge of duties such as confinement management and interfered with the execution of duties, and inflicted an injury on him.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to D, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (Attachment of documentary evidence; Attachment of a diagnosis report by the victim);

1. Articles 257 and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. There are extenuating circumstances such as the following: (a) the ordinary concurrence of crimes; (b) the reason for sentencing under Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (the punishment imposed under heavier punishment; (c) the reason for sentencing [the scope of recommending punishment] [the scope of general injury] under Article 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes (6 months to 2 years of imprisonment]; (c) where the defendant interferes with the performance of public duties (the special aggravation of punishment] [the decision of sentence] where the defendant acknowledges the crime and is against mistake; (d) the degree of injury does not seem to be particularly heavy; and (e) the defendant committed the crime of this case by mental disorder during which he was suffering from ordinary pain while he was sentenced to imprisonment for a prolonged term; and (e) the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case by contingency due to mental disorder.

However, the crime of this case is being executed by the defendant in prison.