On March 23, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively weapons, threats), and violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.) at the Busan District Court on August 23, 2012, and was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence

From around 01:40 to 02:00 on May 10, 2013, the Defendant saw the victim H (n, 36 years of age) who was flick-gu in Busan, to leave the victim G (n, 58 years of age) at the F entertainment tavern flick-gu, Busan, which was in combination with the victim G (n, the female employees). The Defendant saw the victim G to “Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YY Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Accordingly, the defendant habitually detained victims, and inflicted an injury on victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the victims;

1. A criminal investigation report (No. 4, 6, 7, and 16) and criminal records;

1. Habituality of the judgment: The habituality under Article 2 (1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, which is recognized as a habitive wall in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the number of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment, does not mean only the habituality between the crimes listed in each subparagraph of the same paragraph, but means the habit of all the crimes listed in each subparagraph of the same paragraph.

Therefore, the above.