When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 24, 2015, around 19:25, the Defendant: (a) called the victim E (e.g., 56 years of age) from the third floor D Skina of the 3rd floor underground floor of the building of the Suwon-si Suwon-si, and (b) served the victim’s flap to the restaurant gate, leading the victim to the restaurant gate and leading him to the outside.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV image data CDs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 260 (Selection of Penalty)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act merely provides clothes to prevent the defendant from interfering with the victim's business, and it does not constitute an act that does not go against the party's act or social rules. However, according to the evidence of the judgment, the defendant's act is unlawful even if the circumstances are considered in consideration of ① the location of the victim's clothes earned by the defendant, ② the intensity and duration of the miscellaneous robbery.

Since it is judged, the defendant's argument is rejected.