On April 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and two years of suspended execution, and on May 10, 2016, the Defendant is the person for whom the said judgment became final and conclusive, and the representative of C Company.

On August 30, 2015, the Defendant acquired the Defendant’s ownership and business right in 1,60,000,000 from the construction wastes located in the second floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D building to the victim G, the major shareholder and the chairperson of the said company, the Plaintiff, at the office of E (the representative director F).

It can be sold as recycled aggregate, and if breaking and disposing of it, 40-5 million won can be collected from the land owner on a flat basis, and melted wastes can be sold as aggregate in circulation. "In this case, a partnership contract was concluded with the content of the business of processing construction wastes by breaking and crushing them."

However, the defendant only entered into an agreement that is entitled to succeed to the rights of the Corporation I as the original right of the above construction wastes, and does not transfer the possession thereof.

In addition, on June 19, 2009, the Incheon District Court sentenced on the purport that "Defendant I, a corporation, taking property, such as recycled aggregate, and transferring land, which was entrusted with the ownership of the owner of the land whose construction waste was deposited," was sentenced to a substitute execution on August 11, 2014 that "the above loaded goods may be taken at the expense of I, a corporation by directly or by delegation of the Korea Land Trust to the small and medium enterprise cooperative succeeding to the Korea Land Trust," and according to the decision, the court sentenced to substitute execution on August 11, 2014 that "the above loaded goods may be taken at the expense of I, a corporation by delegation of the Korea Land Trust." The above construction and disposal by the J Association composed of the landowners, could not be disposed of by the defendant, and it could not be sold by crushing construction wastes, nor could the landowner receive the disposal costs from the landowners.

The defendant.