2. The facts that the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime are favorable; however, the instant crime promotes the general public to commit an excessive speculative spirit, and thus requires strict punishment; the Defendant repeatedly commits the instant crime even if he/she had the record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime; and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, happiness and environment, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, are considered as being comprehensively taken into account. As such, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.