When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[criminal history] On July 25, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million on the grounds of a violation of road traffic law at the Hongsung Branch of the Daejeon District Court, and a fine of KRW 3 million on December 7, 2012.

Defendant 2, “2015 High 426,” even though he had had a history of driving alcohol more than twice as above, Defendant 2 driven B-learning car at around 16:26 on October 13, 2014, while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.096% in the section of approximately 70 meters from the old ropolym in front of the sea wave in the same region from the old ropolym, thereby driving B-learning car at around 70 meters.

Defendant 2, “2015 high-speed 427,” even though he had had the aforementioned two or more times of driving alcohol, Defendant 2 driven a 3 km section with B-learning car from the front of potato the front of the potatop to the front of the port distance in the same city and the front of the same city, while he was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.056% among the blood transfusion around 17:40 on September 27, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

【Criminal Records】

1. "Inquiry about criminal history and report on investigation (a copy of a summary order)" 2015 High Court Order 426;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. A report on the circumstances of the driver's license in the main place of business on the statement of the situation of the driver's license in the main place of business;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the circumstances of drivers at home;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (excluding punishment) concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 of the same Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;