beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.01.25 2018고단119

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On December 1, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Jung-gu District Court on December 1, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence in the medical prison on February 22, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】 From 21:20 on December 209, 2017 to 22:00 on the same day, the Defendant heard the statement to the effect that the Defendant “D” was satisfed within the family of “D” operated by the victim C in Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyangyang-gu, and her desire for other customers to drink, and she was able to have the victim go home.

The Defendant, within the above business site, expressed a large amount of 30 minutes of tin-time tin-free tin-free tin-free shot, shots, and shots in the Republic of Korea, and interfered with the victim’s operation of the head office by force for about 30 minutes.

[2018 Highest 3235] From October 2017 to January 31, 2018, the Defendant, as a dump truck driver affiliated with the victim E, from Seoul and Gyeonggi House, performed the business of transporting soil and stones and aggregate of the victim company. In the process, the victim company’s corporate card (IBK Bank Credit Card, F) was used for the maintenance and repair of dump trucks owned by the victim company, so in such a case, the Defendant had a duty to use the above corporate card for the prescribed purpose.

Nevertheless, on January 20, 2018, the Defendant arbitrarily used the above corporate card when settling the amount of 4,30,000 won from the H main store located on the first floor of the G building in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

In addition, from the above date to February 1, 2018, the Defendant settled the total amount of KRW 3,037,230 in the above 10 manner, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

As a result, the defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to the above settlement amount in violation of his occupational duty, and caused the same loss to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 119]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C.