The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the court of first instance, the court below’s determination that the charges of this case were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence and exceeding the bounds of the logical and empirical rules or by violating the rules of evidence

Meanwhile, the argument that the court below erred in the misapprehension of legal principles as to self-defense or legitimate act is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as alleged in the ground of appeal by the defendant, or by the court below's decision that it is not subject to judgment ex officio.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.