1. As to the Defendant L’s grounds of appeal, the lower court, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, determined that the instant facts charged against the said Defendant were recognized, and rejected the allegation of the grounds of appeal for misconception of facts.

The allegation in the grounds of appeal is merely a dispute over the selection and probative value of evidence belonging to the free judgment of the fact-finding court, and the reasoning of the judgment below is examined in light of the records, and there is no violation of the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, nor any violation of the legal procedures prescribed in the Criminal Procedure Act, contrary to the allegations

2. According to Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act as to the grounds of appeal by Defendants B, C, and D, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. As such, all of the arguments to the effect that punishment is too heavy in the instant case where each fine is imposed against the said

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.