If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

The Defendant is a volunteer teacher who worked for the same school as the victim D(n, 40 years of age), and around April 201, the Defendant demanded temporary retirement from the side of the school on the ground that he committed an indecent act on the part of the victim on the side of the school on September 201, through November 201, and when he fell away from the school administration examination, the Defendant demanded the remaining victim to be “compensation for damage”.

On April 7, 2012, the Defendant, around April 21, 2012, entered a defective story for the foregoing reasons, and talked about the victim’s meals in the vicinity of the Sokjin Culture and Arts Center, which was in the Sokjin-jin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, and receiving compensation for its damage, and reached the parking lot.

The defendant shall not have a victim who intends to return to Korea and shall not exceed franchis.

The defendant, who had been parked across the parking lot floor and laid down the arms of the victim, forced the Echip to the back seat of the passenger car of the victim, and took the victim's cell phone, took the victim's cell phone, and took the victim's hand knife and knife the other hand knife of the victim's hand knife, and prevented the victim from escape.

The Defendant laid down approximately three minutes of the wall, and dried up to 05:00 on April 8, 2012, and prevented the victim from coming out of the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant detained the victim on the vehicle for about seven to forty minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the confirmation of details of D's complaint, Defendant's preparation, and Sms receipt;

1. Article 276 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime: Selection of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s crime of sentencing on Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the reason of sentencing of the provisional payment order is a kind of retaliation crime, and the Defendant’s crime of harassment is committed in this part by continuously transmitting text messagess to the victim even after the crime was committed.