However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 01:40 on May 10, 2014, the Defendant: (b) confirmed that there was no error in the identification of the taxi engineer’s driver’s license and the number; (c) confirmed that the taxi engineer’s 112 return to the path; (d) reported that the taxi engineer’s license was verified; and (e) demanded that the Defendant inform the Defendant of his personal information after confirming that the taxi engineer’s license and the number was not exceeded; and (d) demanded that the police officer be informed of his personal information. The Defendant expressed that “the police will take a bath. Ithmthmthm, he will take a bath; and (e) was placed on the h’s bridge to stop it, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties.

2. When the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender at the date, time, at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph 1., and was seated on the back page of the patrol car No. 34B5176, the Defendant damaged 110,000 won of the market value of the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. Each police statement of H and G;

1. A written statement of the I;

1. A damaged photograph and closure photograph;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is that the defendant assaults police officers to obstruct the performance of official duties and damages patrol cars, but the nature of the crime of this case is not less than that of the defendant. However, considering the fact that the defendant was committed at the time of committing the crime, and the defendant has not been punished for obstruction of the performance of official duties or damage to public goods, the punishment shall be determined as ordered