【Criminal Records】 On April 15, 2016, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 as a crime of fraud at the Gwangju District Court, and the same year.

5. 9. The same court issued the summary order of KRW 300,000 for the same crime, and the summary order of KRW 700,000 for the same crime at the same court on the 31st of the same month, respectively.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On August 4, 2017, around 08:40, the Defendant: (a) stolen, around 42, the first floor of the Southern University Hospital in Gwangju-dong-gu, Gwangju-gu and the first floor in which the victim C was able to communicate with the original director and the staff of the university hospital in front of the victim, and (b) stolen the victim’s phone call, one of which was 300,000 won at the market price where the victim was laid to the front director and the waiting room.

2. On September 8, 2017, the Defendant habitually committed fraud: (a) around 09:40 on September 8, 2017, at the second floor of the South Korean University Hospital in the second half of the 322 picture, the Defendant was sent back to the victim D, “A person interested in the same interest as a party watch, and a police box in the interest of the deceased.”

The hospital was in the same way with the hospital, and there was a false statement to the effect that, as the hospital expenses in Korea currently fall short of the hospital expenses, 100,000 won will be repaid immediately if she is off, she would pay it.

However, in fact, the defendant was not at the above hospital, and the defendant did not receive treatment at the above hospital and did not pay hospital expenses. The defendant merely received cash from those who suffered damage to rural older persons and thought to use it as a cost of living. Thus, even if he was paid cash from the victims of damage, he did not have the intention or ability to complete payment.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) obtained a cash sum of KRW 90,00 from the victim; and (c) obtained a total of KRW 2,60,000 from that time to that time; and (d) received a delivery of KRW 2,00,000,000 from that time to that time, as indicated in the List of Offenses.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually obtained another's property by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. D. D.