beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.06.12 2014고단551

컴퓨터등사용사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 1, 2012, the Defendant received a proposal to withdraw money from D to the Republic of Korea and to offer money for 2% of the withdrawal amount in return for sending it to China through the Shipbuilding, which was known to the police officer on November 2013, 2013, when entering the Republic of Korea and living in the Republic of Korea.

D in China, through the defendant, obtained by defraudation of a word-known passbook to be used for the crime, and delivered the money through the defendant to the domestic withdrawal book, and transferred the money by minmination method to the minmination passbook, and the defendant, who manages the domestic withdrawal book, intended to have the domestic withdrawal book, such as C, withdraw the amount of damage and send the amount of damage to China.

1. Fraud;

A. On November 1, 2013, the Defendant conspired with a domestic withdrawal note, etc. with which the name of the victim cannot be known, the Defendant obtained a passbook, a e-mail card, a password, etc. from the head of the Tong, and obtained a false statement to the effect that he/she would bring KRW 500,000 per share to the victim E by telephone at the victim E at a location unclaimed on November 1, 2013, and acquired it from the victim around November 25, 2013 through a high-speed bus bus bus terminal at the same time as the victim’s name, via a high-speed bus bus transportation.

B. In collusion with the Defendant’s domestic withdrawal books, etc. whose name is unknown, the Defendant’s false statement to the effect that “In spite of no intention or ability to borrow the loan even after obtaining the passbook, c, password, etc., the Defendant would allow the victim F to obtain a loan by sending the passbook, etc. by telephone from the beginning scam on December 2013, 2013,” and then, the Defendant’s false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would allow the victim F to obtain a loan by extending the transaction performance by sending the passbook, etc.” was made by the victim. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 24880, Dec. 3, 2013>