However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 11, 2013, the Defendant driven BM5 car at around 00:10, and proceeded with the fourth line road in front of the Macar Center located in Sungnam-dong 3971, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, according to one-lane away from the shooting distance of the mother market.

At all times, there has been a center line of yellow solid lines, so the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive without over the center line.

그럼에도 피고인은 유턴을 하기 위해 중앙선을 넘어 반대차로로 진행하다가 마침 반대차로 1차로를 진행하던 C(여, 43세)이 운전하는 D 아우디 승용차의 앞범퍼 부분을 위 SM5 승용차 옆 부분으로 들이받고, 그 충격으로 튕겨나가면서 반대차로 4차로에 주차되어 있던 피해자 E 소유의 F 엑센트 승용차 왼쪽 뒤 휀다 부분을 위 SM5 승용차 오른쪽 앞 휀다 부분으로 들이받았다.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as cage cage cages and tensions that require approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and, at the same time, escaped without any necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the said EX car and providing relief to the victim, even though it damages the said EX car to be in excess of KRW 32,142,30 of the repairing cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate for general repair costs and written estimate for automobile inspection and maintenance;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 of the Criminal Act: