폭행
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. On December 12, 2015, the summary of the facts charged: (a) the Defendant, located in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, expressed the Defendant’s desire to make the victim locked at the victim’s kid in the Dog-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, and used the Defendant’s desire to read “Fa
2. Determination:
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) and (1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) On April 4, 2016, the victim’s expression of intention not to punish the victim.
(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;