On May 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 22:15, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on the roads of the New Si of Cheongsung-gu, Daegu Suwon-dong, and was taking a D taxi operated by the victim C (63 years of age) under the influence of alcohol; (b) the Defendant her desireed the victim on the ground that the victim would drive the taxi back to his/her destination; (c) committed assault on the part of the victim on the part of the victim’s left shoulder, she was hicking the victim’s neck with both arms at a time when the victim hacks the victim’s neck on the part of the victim’s left part; and (d) suffered injury, such as a fluoral dum dumumum

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation and caused the injury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A criminal investigation report (seven pages of evidence records) (the defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the injury suffered by the victim is not caused by the assault of the defendant.

However, according to each of the above evidence, the following circumstances are acknowledged: (a) the Defendant committed assault against the victim, i.e., (i) the victim’s left shoulder at several times, (ii) the victim was assaulted by the Defendant, and (iii) the victim requested the police to rapidly rescue the cab in front of the earth; and (iv) the Defendant continued to stop the victim until the police reported the Defendant and the victim were removed from the earth; and (v) the Defendant was unable to reach the extent that the Defendant’s assault did not cause any injury.

It is not to be seen that the victim was diagnosed at E hospital to the effect that there is a need to receive approximately two weeks' medical treatment with the climatic base and the climatic base, and the victim took an injection together with the physical treatment. ④ The part and degree of the above injury can be sufficiently caused by the Defendant’s above assault.

In full view of the fact that the injured person suffered the above injury due to the Defendant’s assault.

may be appointed by a person.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's above assertion.