1. On June 12, 2014, around 22:50, the Defendant: (a) took a taxi operated by the victim B (E. 53) on the street in front of the building of Handong-dong-dong-gu, Busan-si, Gyeonggi-do-si; (b) opened a door out of the signal signal; and (c) made the phone calls known to be closed by the victim of the defect; and (d) thereby impairing its utility by destroying repair dogs by causing the defect of the phone, i.e., getting off from the taxi, and getting off from the taxi to the front door.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, insultingly insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim by putting the humb .h. Mali fe without being tight.hum humb.h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h.h. h. h. h.h.) among others.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of statutes on taxi photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the form of the instant crime, the degree of damage, the Defendant’s entire confessions and reflects the instant case, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive and progress of the crime, and other various conditions of sentencing as ordered.