1. On February 17, 2015, the Defendant would be able to receive from H the cost of operation of KRW 2.5 million per month if he/she entered H (hereinafter “H”) to the victim F at the E-cafeteria operated by the Defendant’s wife D in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, with “A bus in the name of KRW 30 million (the market price equivalent to KRW 6 million)” (hereinafter “H”) at KRW 30 million.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, at the time, H was not a loan from a bank, and more than 2 years and 6 months have elapsed since it was interrupted, and even if the Defendant received money from the injured party due to the lack of a regular receipt of bus operation right from H, he did not have the intent or ability to reduce the bus operation right.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 20 million won from the victim as the down payment on the same day by taking the Daegu Bank Account (I) in the name of the defendant.

2. Around July 6, 2007, the Defendant: (a) transferred KRW 20 million to the Victim J on the condition that the Defendant would pay the Defendant operating profit by entering the k 45 passenger van to the steering boat of the Fridong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, to another company; (b) however, (c) on the condition that the Defendant could not obtain operating profit under the agreement and demand the Defendant to reverse the said transfer contract; and (d) on April 16, 2008, enter the victim in the parking lot located in the Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, to another company.

At the same time, it was handed over by the injured party.

On June 2, 201, while the defendant kept the above van for the victim, he was dismissed by receiving 3.5 million won from M in Yongcheon-si L with the mind.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of F in the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement of F or N of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the accused;

1. The police of D. D.