beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.06.08 2018고합170

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[2] On March 17, 200, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Western District Court on May 22, 2003, and one year and six months for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Southern District Court on September 14, 2006 at the same court on September 14, 2006, and one year and six months for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the same court on April 8, 2008, and two years for a crime of larceny at the same court on February 17, 2011. On April 2, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the execution of the sentence terminated on July 6, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed theft by using the gap of KRW 450,000 in cash in which the victim E was hospitalized in the D Hospital located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, by using the gap of KRW 613 at around 14:0,000 in cash; and (b) by using one night-folding half-fold in the market price equivalent to KRW 100,000 in cash.

The defendant, including this, from around that time, is the same year.

4. By September 4, 200, the victims’ property was stolen habitually over six occasions, such as the list of offenses in the annexed list.

2. On April 9, 2018, the Defendant in violation of the Act on Financial Business Specializing in Fraud and Credit is a victim’s name in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, as well as a legal interest in protecting the victim’s property. Therefore, in a case where the owner of the property, which was the object of deception, is different from the victim who disposed of the property, the victim of fraud is the owner of the property.

Therefore, in this case, the victim should be viewed as operating convenience points, not only I employees of the convenience store who are the network, but also I.

A. at G convenience stores operated by a Party, more than KRW 135,000 tobacco equivalent to the market value of KRW 130,000,000, more than KRW 90,000,00;