However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 11, 2017, the Defendant, at the branch of the Saemaul Bank C in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, where the Defendant works as an employee, placed KRW 10,500,000 in cash located in the cash withdrawal machine, KRW 6,200,00 in cash located in the second floor cash withdrawal machine, and KRW 60,953,000 in cash located in the second floor, which was 60,953,00 in the second floor, and KRW 77,653,00 in the paper plastic bag. The summary of evidence was stolen.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to D, E, and F;

1. An investigation report (verification of on-site CCTV images);

1. Protocols of seizure, list of seizure and photograph of seized articles;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] The mitigation area (4 to 10 months) of the mitigation area of general property / [Special Mitigation] [Decision of Punishment], the defendant escaped after theft of cash from the Saemaul credit cooperative in which he/she was working. The nature of the crime is not good, the amount of damage is about 77 million won, the amount of damage is large, recognized as favorable error and reflects the victim, the damage is recognized and reflected, the victim has no record of criminal punishment other than the punishment once for this paper crime, and the records and changes of punishment are determined by taking into account the following as a whole: the motive and circumstances of the crime, the means of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc.