Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On August 16, 2014, from around 09:40 to 10:25 of the same day, the Defendant changed alcohol to the victim’s credit from “Emart” operated by the victim D in Gwangju City from around 09:40 to around 10:25 of the same day, but the Defendant interfered with the victim’s mam business by force by preventing the victim from entering the scene by getting the victim’s sound, such as “Chewing singke” to the victim who did not comply with the victim’s request.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine for the crime, and the choice of a fine for the crime (the fact that the victim does not want punishment for the defendant in agreement with the victim when it comes to the trial);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;