Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Although the defendant was married with B, it is currently pending trial by filing a divorce lawsuit on October 14, 2016.

1. On September 2, 2016, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) stated “C”, “total amount of termination”, “B”, and “B” in the name column in the face number column of the application form for termination in order to terminate the account used by the Defendant at a location in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 240-30, North Korea-dong, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, in the name of the said branch; and (b) placed the Defendant’s seal next to the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of the termination application in the name of private document B, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, exercised the instant investigation document as if the filing of a forged termination application was a document duly formed, as described in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a transaction application, termination application, and transaction statement;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;