"2013 Highest 150"

1. Each of the Defendants’ frauds, Defendant A, and Defendant B made a false statement that they would make a loan to the victims of many unspecified persons by opening his/her mobile phone virtual phone at a higher credit rating, and that they would obtain a copy of his/her identification card and contact number, etc. to the victims, and the victims who suffered from L, M, M, and false names opened his/her mobile phone in the name of the victims after sending his/her identification card and contact number to the above Defendant A and B, and then receiving rebates for opening his/her mobile phone from the agency and receiving the mobile phone mobile phone phone phone phone calls for the mobile phone phone opening in the name of the victims, and 350,000 won out of his/her fees for opening his/her mobile phone from the agency and conspired to have them divided into L, M, and false names.

Defendant

A and Defendant B, from September 17, 2012 to October 11, 2012, had an office in the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government O, from the next day to December 17, 2012, and from January 17, 2013, employed Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, Defendant H, Defendant I, Defendant I, Defendant J and Q as employees.

Defendant

C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, Defendant G, Defendant I, Defendant J, and Q, are in charge of telephone counselor’s duties to call to the victims based on personal information and counseling phrases provided by Defendant A and Defendant B at the above office and to open a cell phone. Defendant H, as a team leader, was in charge of handling civil petitions against the opening of a cell phone and the opening of a cell phone in addition to the above telephone counselor duties.

When the defendants open a mobile phone in the above manner, the defendants C, D, defendant E, who is a counselor who opened a mobile phone at the fee of KRW 350,000 per 1,00, an accomplice, and who is a counselor who opened the mobile phone.