However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 1:55 on August 19, 2017, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol at the third parking lot of Heungdong-gu B lending, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju-si, and was parked in the said parking lot, and then, the Defendant, who was parked in the said parking lot, destroyed the repair cost of KRW 1,037,738 by inserting the glass windows and doors of the victim C, the victim C, a dangerous object, which was parked in the said parking lot.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the spot and damaged photographs;

1. Relevant Article 369 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 369 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The basic area (from August to January 6) of the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] habitually, repeated crimes, and special damage (Habitual, repeated crimes, special damage, etc.) is nonexistent;

2. The sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances following the determination of sentence and other conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime.

The crime is bad in the nature of the defendant's being damaged to the taxi vehicle operated by the defendant by inserting dangerous articles, the damage has not been recovered, the agreement has not been reached, and the confession has been made and is against the fact that there is a record of the same crime.