20 million won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

No money, valuables, entertainment, or other benefits shall be received under the pretext of solicitation or arrangement for cases or affairs handled by a public official.

On August 2010, the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court on the second half of fraud, and asked the defendant to be acquitted from C in a trial, and tried to receive money and valuables on the pretext that the defendant's high school-friendly Gu has been working as a Justice of the Supreme Court in the cryrization to cause the defendant to be acquitted.

At around 13:00 on August 2010, the Defendant heard the horses that he was convicted of fraud in a restaurant located in the business name in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and that he was convicted of fraud from C, and that he was found not guilty, and that “B graduated from and went to the E University, which is located in the Supreme Court, the FJ Justice of the FJJ in the Republic of Korea, has also been in the Republic of Korea and E in the Dong, and the HH in the law firm G is also in the relationship with D and E, and Chh in the relationship with D and H in the family. Upon request of the Republic of Korea, I first agreed to the H lawyer.”

At around 15:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) requested C to appear in the H attorney’s office located in the fourth floor of the Gu I building in Ansan-si in the same day, “I would have so far known of the circumstances; (b) I would come to talk with F Justice of the Republic of Korea; (c) first, the amount of KRW 10 million per week shall be used as expenses; and (d) KRW 10 million shall be brought to F Justice; and (e) if good, the amount of KRW 10 million shall be changed to F Justice; and (e) received KRW 20 million from C to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of the Defendant on August 20, 2010.

Accordingly, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the cases handled by public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning C;

1. A copy of a note, a copy of a receipt without passbook, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes; and