On February 1, 2013, the Defendant sentenced the Suwon District Court to eight months of imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on August 4, 2013.

On February 18, 1998, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a quasi-indecent act by force by the Seoul Eastern District Court, and on January 24, 2008, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment for a quasi-indecent act by force, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on October 22, 2008. On August 13, 2013, the Defendant was determined to attach an electronic tracking device at the Suwon District Court for five years.

A person with an electronic device installed shall not arbitrarily separate or damage the electronic device from his/her body during the period of attachment of the electronic device, interfere with its propagation, alter data received, or otherwise impair its utility.

1. From August 31, 2013 to December 12:13 of the same day, the Defendant, who left the scope of responding to the attachment device, went away from the scope of responding by separating the portable tracking device from the Defendant’s body at a separate place for a total of 12 times from the aforementioned date to December 18, 2013, in a way that the portable tracking device is separated from the Defendant’s body to separate the tracking device in a separate place for 18 minutes, thereby impairing the effectiveness of the electronic device by leaving the scope of responding between the attachment device and the portable tracking device during the period of attachment.

2. At around 18:00 on January 11, 2014, the Defendant damaged the electronic device during the period of attachment of the electronic device by means of destroying and damaging the portable tracking device in possession of the device under investigation, which was found to be a type of crime of interference with business in the Suwon Police Station E district located in Suwon-si, Suwon Police Station E District, Suwon-si, which was located in Suwon-si, for the purpose of interference with business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of the decision;

1. An attachment order;