beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.01.12 2016고단2142

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(개인정보누설등)등

Text

1. Defendant A

(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

(b)Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In full view of the facts stated in the purpose of prosecution and the records, criminal facts shall be corrected to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's exercise of defense

The Defendants are operating a business entity called “E”, which is only another site, only on conditions.

1. From November 27, 2015, the Defendants conspired to operate an advertising model Ftel B 1216 of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, an advertising company “G” and “E” only on the advertisement model, obtained personal information data, such as the name, protogram, and contact information of model users under the name of recruiting an advertising model as the operator of the company “G” on the advertisement model, and then published the same model on the remaining site “E” only on the basis of the collected model users’ photographs, etc.

From the beginning of December 2015 to February 1, 2016, the Defendants approached the advertising model “G” Internet site of the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, through the Defendant’s “G” company’s “G”), to introduce to the victim H, the victim I, and the victim J., and obtained personal information data, such as the victim’s name, protogram image, photo, cell phone number, etc. from the victims. Using such data, the Defendants disclosed personal information, such as the victim H, the victim J’s photograph and real name, and towing name, etc., so that many unspecified male customers can read it, and the victims expressed the false fact that they are women only under the conditions of the “E” Internet site.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to disclose personal information of victims who were aware of in the course of performing their duties, and at the same time, damaged the honor of victims by pointing out false facts.

2. Defendant A is the victim’s personal cellular phone of an unspecified male customer who wants sexual traffic around the time specified in paragraph (1) as if he/she was a sexual traffic female.