beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.08.18 2016나2006369

부정경쟁행위금지 등 청구의 소

Text

1. The part concerning the claim for prohibition of the first instance judgment, including the claim extended and reduced in this court, is as follows.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus cites this case as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified. (3) The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified.

In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance, which received the plaintiff's claim against the defendants, is just (excluding the part invalidated by the reduction of claim in this court), and the part concerning the claim for prohibition of the court of first instance, including the claim extended and reduced in this court, shall be modified as stated in the Disposition No. 1. The appeal on the part concerning the defendant's claim for the execution of the procedure for the registration cancellation