2. The following are the circumstances favorable to the Defendant: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the distance of drunk driving is relatively short of 500 meters; and (c) the Defendant again made it difficult to drive a drunk driving.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is a case where the defendant drives while under the influence of alcohol 0.121%, and the quality of the crime is not weak, and the defendant commits the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that the defendant had already been subject to criminal punishment several times, and it is a crime that may cause serious danger to the life and property of another person as well as himself/herself, and it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, etc. as well as the various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.