2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition such as the confession of the crime of this case and reflects the depth of the defendant, and the defendant seems to be exempted from taking into account the use of the embezzlement of this case. However, regardless of the circumstances of the crime of this case, the damage to the victim of this case was not recovered at all, and the defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had been under suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime, and even though he had been under suspension of execution, he/she had an interview and interview. The defendant escaped during the trial, and all other circumstances constituting the conditions for the sentencing of this case as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, relationship with the victim, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the above argument of the court below is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.