2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The representative director of the Defendant Company, who was the representative director, was holding 100% of the shares of the Defendant Company, and actually managed the Defendant Company. Defendant B, at the time of 4th class 9 to 12th class, changed the location of the Defendant Company to the warehouse of this case where the movables of this case are stored at H in Nam-si, Namyang-si, the location of the Defendant Company was changed to the warehouse of this case. On June 14, 2017 and November 13, 2017, the Defendant Company entered into a contract for factory lease (ware) with the Defendant Company’s name as of November 13, 2017, with the exception of the foregoing 4th class “A No. 11 and 12”, and the Defendants were jointly held with the Defendant Company’s 1’s corporeal movable property, and thus, the Defendants were jointly held with the Defendant Company’s 4th class 20 to 21st class and 51th class, and the Defendants were jointly held with the Defendant Company’s 1’s movable property of this case.

2. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case against the Defendants should be accepted on the grounds of the reasoning.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendants' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.