beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.16 2017나54182

위자료

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

In accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, the part concerning "1. Facts recognized" and "a summary of the party's assertion" among the grounds of the judgment of the first instance which partially accepted the judgment.

Judgment

In full view of the purport of arguments in each part of the claim for the delay in taking part of the surgery (the medical record No. 4-1 to 12) and each part of the first instance court E’s request for evaluation of medical records (hereinafter “evaluation result”), the defendant’s rehabilitation department diagnosed that it is necessary to ascertain that there is suspicion of thirical symptoms for the victim on December 19, 2012 and to observe the change of symptoms through rehabilitation treatment until the middle of January 2013, 2013. The victim appeared to have shown symptoms that it was difficult for the victim to divers, and that there was no further need to observe the victim’s thalopical surgery for 20th of January 21, 2013 (the 3th of January 2013, 2013). As a result, the victim’s thalopical surgery was conducted on the 2nd of January 23, 2013, and there was no further need to observe the victim’s thalopical surgery.

The plaintiff asserted that the defendant should have started measures for the recovery of cerebral ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic e