beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.12.19 2013고정414

도로법위반

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The above fines are not paid by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C It is the Department G of metal labor unions G, Defendant A is the Department H of two cars in metal labor unions and Defendant B is the Department I of two cars in metal labor unions.

No one shall build, rebuild, alter, alter, or remove any structure, object, or other facility in a road zone, or occupy and use any road for other purposes.

Nevertheless, the Defendants jointly install a branch office of the deceased on the road in front of the door of a two motor vehicle between April 11, 2012 and April 555, 2012 without obtaining permission to occupy and use the road from the competent administrative agency, and from April 11:05 to December 12:05, the same year after installing one tent (2M x 2M).

5. It has been maintained until 18.

As a result, the Defendants occupied roads without permission from the management agency.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of the witness J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographic materials, such as installation of a sales office on April 4;

1. Subparagraph 3 of Article 97 and Article 38(1) of the former Road Act (Amended by Act No. 12248, Jan. 14, 2014);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. According to Article 97 subparagraph 3 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 12248, Jan. 14, 2014; hereinafter “former Road Act”), a person who intends to build, rebuild, alter, or remove a structure, object, or other facility in a road zone pursuant to Article 38 (1) of the former Road Act or who intends to occupy and use a road for other purposes shall obtain permission from the road management agency, and a person who occupies and uses the road (excluding a person who temporarily sets up goods, etc. on the road) without permission in violation of Article 334 (1) of the same Act and his/her defense counsel’s assertion. The tent installed by the defendants shall be occupied and used under the former Road Act.