However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 10, 2013, the Defendant introduced himself/herself as if he/she was a professor of the E University, to the victim D, who was aware of through G, who was not a teacher of the E University, in the F University, on May 10, 2013. However, the Defendant would be able to receive KRW 50,000,000 from the victim by requesting the professor of the F University so that G would receive KRW 50,000 from the F University.

“.....”

However, even if the defendant received the above money from the injured party, G did not have any intention or ability to get the above money to be given to IT-related youth start-up support fund by requesting the professor of F University.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, obtained a total of KRW 6 million from the victim to receive KRW 2 million on May 13, 2013, KRW 200 million on May 23, 2013, KRW 200 million on May 23, 2013, and KRW 2 million on August 5, 2013, respectively.

2. On May 28, 2013, the Defendant, in violation of the law, established a court’s principal business with the victim D and the victim I, who is the dynamics of the F University D, at a coffee shop in the F University D D D D D’s dental hospital located in G, G, G, G around that time, with the view to establishing a court’s principal business with the main business of selling the sales of the wired and wireless automatic fire. In order to supply the wired and wireless automatic fire fire fire fire to the government offices, the Defendant ought to be included in the budget with the ordinary budget.

In order to reflect in the background budget, 200 million won shall be given to the public official in charge of the background budget of the central government office and the expenses shall be paid.

20 million won changed. The phrase “........”

However, even if the defendant received the above money from the victims, he was thought to use it for the repayment of the borrowed money to K and for the personal purpose, and was known, there was no public official in charge of the central government office's drilling budget or there was no idea to deliver the above money to the above public official, and to the contrary in relation to the above business.

Nevertheless, the defendant is treated as a public official.