2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant and the victim C are pro-friendly.

At around 16:30 on November 12, 2012, the Defendant ruled that “Ara does not construct the building in this building” to the victim on the ground that the victim was about to carry out remodeling works for the building lot numbered, and that there is no good appraisal with the ordinary victim and appraisal. The Defendant interfered with the victim’s remodeling works by force by blocking access to the building from a car on the access road to the building, blocking the entrance and exit of the building on the parking lot, blocking the building from spreading.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site inspection and complaint;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above.