However, for the defendant A from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, two years shall apply.

around 03:55 on September 14, 2015, the Defendants were under drinking alcohol at a “D” restaurant located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant A was under drinking alcohol on another table.

E was arrested as a current offender by the police G belonging to the police branch of the police station F District of the Guro-gu Police Station, which called upon E’s 112 report on the wind on the wind for the reason that E was slick, for the reason that E was slick. Accordingly, Defendant B attempted to take the above G out of the restaurant of Defendant A, and “hicking our drinking?”

"I kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't.

Defendant A continuously resisted at the front of the aforementioned “D” restaurant, and tried not to leave the vehicle, after hearing the words from the above G to the rear seat of the patrol vehicle, and at the resistance of Defendant A, “I am h, I am h?h?h?h?????h????h?????

The bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch mar, v. n. G’t the chest part of G with two arms, Defendant B took the attitude that the left part of G in which Defendant A wishes to board on the back part of the patrol seat, Defendant B took the view that he would be able to go on the back of the patrol seat, and she was pushed off by her head, and she was pushed down with G by ship.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to assault G and interfere with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers related to the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Application of statutes on police statements made to H and G;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] [Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties: [Article 1] No basic area: June to one year and four months [the person subject to special sentencing] [the sentence] decision] is an assault exercised in the instant process; the extent of assault committed during the instant process; circumstances in which the Defendants recognized a mistake; and other arguments in the instant case, such as the Defendants’ age, sexual behavior; criminal records; circumstances after the