However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 19, 2016, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of one million won or more due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Cheongju District Court on May 19, 2016, and the same criminal records are more than three times.

Nevertheless, at around 18:25 on March 27, 2020, the Defendant driven C Lasta car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.146% at the section of approximately 2.5km from the Do in front of the mutually unclaimed restaurant in the Seocho-gu Seo-gu, Seoju-si to the front of the Cheongju-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the state of state of drinking drivers, and notification of the results of the regulation of drinking driving;

1. Previous records before ruling: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification of the same kind of power, etc.) and statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (such as the fact that the defendant has no history of criminal punishment heavier than the fine, and the fact that the defendant supports his/her child without re-offending in the future and is living conscientiously);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act regarding community service order;