However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. When the F Representative Victim G was unable to obtain funds to purchase real estate from HH and 57 lots of land in Gwangju-si, and the Defendant came to know through I that he was trying to obtain a higher appraisal price for the said real estate in order to obtain a loan as collateral, the Defendant was aware of the fact that he/she was in the process of making efforts to obtain a higher appraisal price for the said real estate. The Defendant was able to receive an appraisal report from the Korea Appraisal Board at KRW 63 billion on the ground that he/she knew of the place of Sungnam branch of the Korea Appraisal Board. The Defendant was required to bear expenses, and the Defendant’s horse was transferred from the victim to the Daegu Bank account under the name of J on September 29, 201.

However, on November 28, 201, the Defendant did not receive any particular form of money as above, and the victim visited the office of the Defendant located in Daegu-gu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and the Defendant stated that “The Defendant knows that the head of Sungnam branch of the Korea Appraisal Board is in need of KRW 500 million at the expense of KRW 300 million at the expense of KRW 300 million at the expense of one week a week, and will receive a written appraisal of 63 billion won within this frame.”

Accordingly, the victim transferred 50 million won to the above Daegu Bank Account on the same day, and delivered cashier's checks to the defendant at par 220 million won.

However, in fact, the defendant did not know the male branch of the Korea Appraisal Board directly and did not know about the appraisal business.

Moreover, as the victim said, there was no possibility for the Korea Appraisal Board to issue an appraisal report within a period between a week and a ten-day period. As the Korea Appraisal Board did not deal with the appraisal business requested by the general public from July 1, 2009, it was impossible for the victim to receive an appraisal report by the Korea Appraisal Board which caused the appraisal of the said real estate in a normal way.

Nevertheless, the defendant is above.