beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.02 2017고단6351

위증

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 11, 2016, Defendant A appeared as a witness in Busan District Court No. 353 at the Busan District Court Decision 353 at the Busan District Court Decision 2015Da2884, Nov. 11, 2016.

Defendant 1 was the presiding judge, etc. of the above court in the hearing of the above case, and “At the meeting of the meeting, Defendant D had the franchis of this E, and had the sulbling

“I do not have any question.”

Fixture of Franchi

Before the completion of the meeting, the Defendant (D) was satisfed and satched and satisfed.

“I do not have any question.”

At around 19:00 on February 29, 2016, the Defendant testified to the effect that, at the time of the meeting of the resident representative held in the meeting of the management office of the F apartment complex of Busan Northern-gu, the Defendant was present near the situation, but D did not have any satching and satisfing the eat.

However, the fact that at the time, the representative meeting of occupants at the time, the defendant et al. interferes with the progress of the proceedings of E, the chairperson of the representative meeting, and the E et al. will complete

In order to leave, there was a defect in leaving.

D, as a matter of interest related to the apartment fire fighting construction, D had been able to carry and trace E’s breath, and the Defendant testified to E as a good and false testimony even if she had seen it as close to this, even though she had seen it as close.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. On November 11, 2016, Defendant B appeared as a witness of the Defendant in the Busan District Court No. 353 of the Busan District Court case (2016 High Court Decision 2884, Nov. 11, 2016), which was located in the Busan District Court of Law No. 353, the Defendant 2016.

Defendant 1 was the presiding judge, etc. of the above court, etc. under the hearing of the above case, and “Defendant E” (Defendant D) was not a magazine

“I became aware of the question”

“,” and “Defendant (D) is wholly damped of the flabbbage of this E.

“I did not publish the question.”

“....”