If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a driver of a passenger car by siren B.

On August 28, 2013, 04:11, on the street near the eart distance, which is located in the Egypt-si movable property located in the Hasan City, the said vehicle has a duty of care to safely operate the steering gear and operation of the steering gear and the steering gear in a correct manner, if the said vehicle gets straight ahead of the three-lanes in the direction of the Egypt-si basin at the port of the main post office of the State.

Nevertheless, he neglected to do so.

On the left side of the vehicle, the central separation zone was collisioned by the negligence of overworking the Hand.

Therefore, even though the central separation zone repair cost of approximately KRW 1,932,00, which is the damaged object, damaged property was damaged and escaped without any measure as the driver of the accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Application of evidence, photographs, and written estimates to the accident site;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing reason of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is erroneous in that the defendant's act of leaving the scene after a traffic accident is highly likely to be subject to criticism. However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances: the defendant's act of leaving the scene after a traffic accident is highly likely to be subject to criticism; the defendant's act of deceiving the criminal act is against the wrongness;