However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 15, 2013, at around 23:15, the Defendant: (a) was asked about D cafeteria located in the Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu Dong-gu, Police Station Edistricted by the traffic accident report and asked questions about traffic accident circumstances and personal information from G in front of the D cafeteria located in the C market in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and Police Station Edistricted by the site; (b) the Defendant: (c) “A person who was living in the Cheongju prison to the Cheongju-gu; (d) was asked about whether or not he knows the width; and (e) was aware of the weather accident circumstances and personal information; and (e) was sent to the Cheongju-gu, Daegu-gu; and (e) the person who was living in the Cheongju-gu, Daegu-gu; and (e) was able to look into the Cheongju-gu, Seoul; and (e) the Defendant was able to use the flab by assaulting the flaf to the port; and (e) made the flaf.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations, and at the same time, inflicted injury on the victim G, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and F;

1. A statement prepared by H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant repents and reflects the defendant's wrong, the defendant's crime of this case requires strict punishment by referring to the state power, the defendant's injury to the police officer even from obstructing the performance of official duties, the defendant has been punished several times for violent crimes, the motive and background of the crime of this case, means and methods, circumstances before and after the crime of this case, and other ages of the defendant as shown in the arguments of this case.