If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. The Defendant, at around 16:20 on June 15, 2017, testified in the “C” located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, for the reason that the volume of the ordered sea area is low, and accordingly, the victim D, who is an employee of the above restaurant, will be cancelled.

on the ground that there is an employee E, F, and four customers, “I will be a customer in a so-called so-called so-called “I will be a customer in a so-called so-called “no-satch,” and “I will be a customer in a so-called so-called

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to “”, etc.

2. The Defendant damaged property, at the time and place as described in paragraph 1, putting jumbs to jums, on the ground of the same reasons as described in paragraph 1, and putting the jumbs in the direction of the restaurant calculation unit, putting the above restaurant floor which is the owner of a non-name restaurant business, putting the above restaurant floor up, and destroying the victim’s property so as to have an amount equivalent to KRW 900,000 in repair cost incidental to the accounting substitute type typesetting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the attachment of CCTV videos;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;