beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.01.30 2018나22008

용역비

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the Defendant’s assertion in the trial of the first instance while filing an appeal is not significantly different from that of the Defendant’s assertion in the first instance court, and the judgment of the first instance court rejecting the Defendant’s assertion even if both the evidence submitted in the first instance trial and the purport of the entire pleadings in the first instance trial and the first instance trial are examined, it

Therefore, the reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is that "service charges of KRW 97,878,00" in Part 11 of the second judgment of the court of first instance shall be "service charges of KRW 97,878,00", "employee of the plaintiff" in Part 8 of the third judgment shall be "employee of the defendant", "ship technical use business" in Part 7 of the fifth judgment shall be "ship technical use service business", "the next day after the delivery date of the complaint of this case" in Part 20 of the sixth part of the second judgment shall be "the next day after the delivery date of the original copy of the payment order of this case", and shall be as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for deletion of "the service charges of KRW 97,878,00" in Part 15 of the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance as "the

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.