A. The judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case without assaulting the victim by the victim was erroneous in the misconception of facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, 1) the defendant at the police station: (a) it is recognized that the defendant and the victim have made a physical fighting further in a dispute between the defendant and the victim by stating that "I do not know that I do not have any flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick," and (b) the victim has consistently stated the victim's flick flick flick flick and flick flick flick fl, from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, while the defendant merely stated the victim's flick flick fl, the victim and the victim reported this case.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. The details, motive, means, and method of the crime of unfair sentencing, the consequences and circumstances after the crime, and other age, character, character, and environment of the defendant.