However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Poter Freight Vehicles.

On May 6, 2017, the Defendant came to turn to the left at a speed of about 10 km, regardless of whether it was the mother of the above intersection, when the Defendant came to turn to the left at the speed of about 10 km, from the boundary of the village prior to the so-called so-called d-called d-line intersection at the summer of the mountain.

The location had a duty of care to not proceed beyond the central line to a person engaged in driving along a three-distance intersection where the central line is installed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went to the left at the opposite direction by negligence beyond the center line before reaching the intersection, and caused the part of the Fststama left corner by the victim E (56) drive in the opposite direction, which was driven by the victim E (56).

As a result, the Defendant, by its occupational negligence, suffered injury to the said victim E, such as kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the second public trial date);

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of comprehensive traffic accident analysis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence is not that of the victim I’s injury, and the victim I did not agree with the victims.

On the other hand, this case.