사기
Defendants are not guilty.
1. The summary of the facts charged was detained on charges of violation of the Medical Service Act, etc. on July 28, 2015 while Defendant B opened and operated a two or more convalescent hospital, C convalescent hospital, and D convalescent hospital from around 2007. Defendant A served as the head of the administration and administration in the Convalescent hospital from around 2004.
Defendant
B On April 7, 2015, the Incheon Seo-gu Incheon Vice Governor of the National Health Insurance Corporation decided to recover KRW 3,380,373,210 from the care benefit cost received by the father. The payment due date was notified by April 30, 2015. On May 14, 2015, the National Health Insurance Corporation Incheon Vice Governor visited D convalescent and notified the Defendant of an estimated offset of the medical care benefit cost due to the unpaid payment of other money. The Incheon Vice Governor of the National Health Insurance urged the Defendant to recover the amount each month from May 28, 2015. On September 25, 2015, the Incheon Seo-gu Incheon Building owned by Defendant B, and on September 30, 2015, the building was seized under the circumstances of Defendant B Gohap and the building owned by Defendant B Gohap and on August 2, 2016.
On the other hand, when the double establishment of a hospital around February 2015, Defendant B asked Defendant A to sell the building of a D convalescent hospital. From July 29, 2015 to July 29, 2015, Defendant B received a report on the progress of selling the D convalescent hospital in the Incheon detention center meeting room from A, and received a report on the current status of the D convalescent hospital receipts and taxes in arrears, and around that time, Defendant B received a report on the current status of the D convalescent hospital receipts and taxes in arrears from the employeeF of the D convalescent hospital.
As such, the Defendants are aware of the fact that the building of the D convalescent is in the situation of being immediately seized and that the future revenues of the D convalescent Hospital are set off due to the decision to recover the benefits for medical care, and Defendant A, on August 2015, only the representative director of the Corporation I (hereinafter “I”) representing the victimized Company G (the representative director H and hereinafter “G”) company G (hereinafter “G”) and D medical care institutions are double establishment of the D convalescent hospital.