채무부존재확인
1. The Daegu District Court concluded on June 1, 2013 between the Plaintiffs, the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties.
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant (appointed party; hereinafter “Defendant”) and the appointed party (hereinafter “Defendant and the appointed party”) use the name of the auction asset manager, etc., who is not an attorney-at-law, and engage in real estate sales (auction) with the trade name called “E real estate investment office”. Since around 2012, the Defendant introduced the subject matter of auction cases to the Plaintiffs who are married couple.
B. On June 2013, the Defendants recommended the Plaintiffs to participate in an auction on the land and the building on the ground (hereinafter “instant gas station”) located outside 6,520 square meters, which is the object of the auction in the Daegu District Court and the Daegu District Court and its racing support D real estate rental auction.
However, in the auction case, the gas station of this case was initially assessed at KRW 1,883,03,038,280, and all of the three sale dates were failed at the third sale date, and the minimum sale amount was reduced to KRW 645,882,00 at the time of July 1, 2013, which was the fourth sale date.
C. On July 1, 2013, the Defendants, in consultation with the Plaintiffs, set the bid amount at KRW 888,880,000, followed by obtaining seals, etc. from the Plaintiffs, and submitted them to the auction court under Plaintiff B’s name, and as a result, Plaintiff B was the highest bidder.
Plaintiff
B On July 8, 2013, after receiving a decision of permission for sale from an auction court, B paid all the proceeds of sale on July 31, 2013, and completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the gas station of this case.
On the other hand, the agreement between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants regarding the case of auction of real estate D with the Daegu District Court and its Daegu District Court (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the following terms and conditions as the date of concluding the agreement on June 2013.
(1) The plaintiffs and the defendants share the profits accrued from the acquisition of real estate in the auction of the real estate rental auction case of Daegu District Court and the Daegu District Court and the defendant.