소유권말소등기
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420
The second 10th, "the defendant church is an affiliate of the defendant foundation" means "the defendant church is the branch of the religious organization affiliated with B, and the defendant foundation is an incorporated foundation established for the purpose of owning and managing all churches belonging to B religious organizations and the property necessary for the operation of the above church, the education, relief, childcare facilities, and other social edification service projects, and supplying necessary property."
The 6th part of the 8th part of the 6th part " that it shall be a defendant church's collective ownership of the members of the defendant church, and since the representative of the defendant church was changed to F on March 10, 1997, in order to obtain approval for the use of the 6th part of the 8th part of the 6th part, the name of the building owner shall be changed to the defendant church (F), and the plaintiff shall be deemed to have a duty to cooperate in the procedure for the change of name of the building owner as a person who has been entrusted with the name of the building owner from the defendant church."
2. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is without merit, and it is so dismissed in its entirety. It is so decided as per Disposition.